• 专利附录
  • 专利说明
  • 权利要求
  • 类似技术
  • 同族专利
  • 引用文献
  • 法律状态
  • 优先权
    • 专利摘要:
    Custom alignment system for instruments used in total knee arthroplasty. The alignment system comprises a fixed femoral guide (1) and a tibial guide (4) configured to adapt to the femur and the tibia, resting on these bones without invading the cartilage of the articular surfaces. The tibial guide (4) and two femoral guides that can be attached (2, 3) to the fixed femoral guide (1) allow for properly arranged bone perforations to allow the posterior placement of cutting guides for the placement of a conventional total knee replacement. The guides (1, 2, 3, 4) are designed from a preoperative bone model. The system of the invention provides a more precise alignment compared to other conventional techniques, avoids the use of intramedullary alignment and simplifies the surgery for the placement of a total knee replacement. (Machine-translation by Google Translate, not legally binding)
    公开号:ES2798181A1
    申请号:ES201930512
    申请日:2019-06-06
    公开日:2020-12-09
    发明作者:Alvarez Jose Miguel Sanchez；Arizmendiarrieta Xabier Sanchez；Alzola Gorka Fernandez；Lezeta Ainhoa Lete
    申请人:Mizar Additive Manufacturing S L U；Santxarizmendi Grupo de Investigacion SL；
    IPC主号:
    专利说明:

    [0003] Technical sector
    [0005] The invention relates to a system suitable for surgical use, in particular in total knee arthroplasty procedures. It is a system for the alignment of conventional cutting instruments, usually used to perform bone resections necessary for the subsequent placement of a knee prosthesis. The invention also relates to a design method for such an alignment system.
    [0007] State of the art
    [0009] Mobile joints, such as the knee, shoulder or hip, constitute points of union between bones allowing a series of relative mechanical movements between said bones. In particular, the knee joint serves as a link between the thigh and the leg connecting the femur and the tibia, allowing flexion and extension movements along with limited rotation in the flexed position. These movements are possible thanks to the joint action of the femur, the tibia and a third bone, the patella, which acts as a pulley to allow flexion and extension movements. Articular cartilage, located at the ends of the femur and tibia and on the inside of the patella, covers the articular surfaces. The function of articular cartilage is to protect the bones of the joint and participate in the mechanics of movements, cushioning loads and providing lubrication. As in other joints, a strong capsule arranged around the joint strengthens the bond between the bones, providing strength and stability to the joint. Additionally, a series of ligaments reinforce the joint and restrict the movements of the joint in certain directions.
    [0011] Among the different pathologies that affect the knee joint, osteoarthritis is common. Osteoarthritis is a degenerative disease caused by the deterioration of the articular cartilage as a result of aging or injury. When the articular cartilage deteriorates, the protection and lubrication, usually provided to the articular surfaces, is affected. Consequently, there is a friction between the bone surfaces causing stiffness and pain. Osteoarthritis is not cured, although there are conservative therapies aimed at alleviating associated symptoms and delaying degeneration. However, in cases of severe or advanced deterioration, the most appropriate indication is the implantation of a knee prosthesis to replace the damaged structures.
    [0013] Partial prostheses are known, applicable in cases where the joint disease only partially affects the joint. These prostheses are implanted by means of a conservation surgery aimed at the exclusive replacement of the diseased area of the affected bone, normally allowing a quick recovery. However, in many cases total surgical replacement of the knee joint with a prosthesis is required to replace diseased joint surfaces. The goal is to eliminate pain, restoring joint movement and function to the muscles, ligaments and other soft tissues that control it. This surgical intervention is known as Total Knee Arthroplasty (TKA) or Total Knee Arthroplasty (TKA) in English.
    [0015] For the implantation of a Total Knee Prosthesis (TKP) that restores the function of the joint, it is necessary to resect the diseased or arthritic areas of the femur, the tibia and the patella. Subsequently, two or three prosthetic components are implanted: one in the tibia, one in the femur, and, if necessary, a third patellar component. The materials used in total knee replacement are designed to allow somewhat less mobility than the normal joint. The components are usually made up of a metal element that fits exactly into a plastic element. Various metals, stainless steel, cobalt alloys and chromium or titanium are used. Plastic is usually high-density polyethylene, extremely durable and resistant to wear. Cement can be used to fix the prosthesis components to the bone. There are also uncemented prostheses nailed directly to the bone.
    [0016] To implant a total knee replacement using a TKA, specific instruments are used, consisting of alignment and guidance systems, so that the surgeon can perform the necessary cuts or resections in the femur and tibia with the greatest possible precision, and later , place the prosthetic components on the resected bones. Today's alignment systems involve the making of various incisions and perforations in the femur and tibia in order to place conventional cutting guides. Conventional cutting guides allow a first distal cut to be successively made in the femur, followed by another four cuts to shape the femur and a cut in the tibia. Prosthetic components are placed on the sectioned bones during the surgical procedure. Prior to resections, the cutting guides must be properly positioned and aligned, considering the correct alignment of these cutting guides one of the key factors for the success of a TKA.
    [0018] At present, two types of systems are used for the alignment of the cutting guides. On the one hand, intramedullary alignment systems (standard systems) use intramedullary (IM) references. These standard alignment systems are based on the use of intramedullary rods that cross the bone medullary canal and that can sometimes be associated with excessive bleeding.
    [0020] On the other hand, custom alignment systems use extramedullary (EM) references. This type of system has undergone notable development in recent years, based on the design of specific instrumentation for each patient (specific cutting blocks), seeking a more precise positioning of the femoral and tibial prosthetic components in order to achieve greater success rate in ATR. Patient-specific approaches are based on preoperative imaging of the knee, hip, and ankle to assess the general alignment of the limb. The images can be obtained by techniques known as computed tomography (CT / CT) or magnetic resonance imaging (MR / MRI), obtaining a three-dimensional model of the anatomy of the patient's lower limb. From this three-dimensional model, the anatomical landmarks of the patient's knee can be identified, generating 3D models of the femoral and tibial components of optimal size, position and alignment. The procedure includes a preoperative plan for bone resections. From this preoperative study, the appropriate parameters of orientation, resection depth, location and rotation are determined and blocks or custom extramedullary cutting guides are manufactured for the alignment and placement of the prosthesis during TKA. These custom guides or blocks do not require the introduction of instruments through the intramedullary canal.
    [0022] In any case, TKA is a critical surgical procedure that requires great skill on the part of the surgeon. Excessive bone resection or a small misalignment can cause instability in the joint or early loosening of components. Ultimately, excessive bleeding or insufficiently precise placement of prosthetic components are factors that compromise the success of a TKA.
    [0024] Several comparative studies have been published between conventional alignment systems and alignment systems based on specific shear blocks. For example, the publication "Individualized molds for alignment of primary knee arthroplasty"; Sanz-Ruiz P, Matas-Diez JA, Pérez-Martin A, Vaquero-Martín J; Acta Ortopédica Mexicana, 2014. The publication proposes a comparative analysis between different specific cutting block systems (BCE), which use different imaging methods for preoperative planning, also contrasting results obtained with standard alignment systems. Theoretical advantages of specific systems are pointed out, in relation to the possibility of perform a more precise a priori preoperative planning, reduce surgical time and the necessary instruments and cause less bleeding by not crossing the intramedullary canal. Despite these theoretical advantages, the specific systems imply an extra cost, not being exempt from possible errors in the design process. The publication is also not conclusive regarding the image capture technique more indicated.
    [0025] In line with the above, other subsequent scientific works question again the advantages of personalized extramedullary guides with respect to conventional intramedullary systems. Among the most recent, it is worth mentioning the publication “Patient Specific Instrumented (PSI) in Total Knee Arthroplasty. Should we adopt it "; Ana Sofia Teles Rodrigues, Manuel Antonio Pereira Gutierres; University of Oporto, Faculty of Medicine, Department of Orthopedics and Traumatology, 2016. In this publication several of the concepts previously exposed are explained and a comparative study is carried out between standard instrumentation (Standard Instruments (SI) in English) and specific instrumentation for each patient (Patient Specific Instruments (PSI) in English), analyzing the alignment, cost, effectiveness of the technique and postoperative functional evaluation of each system. The article begins by highlighting the importance of limb alignment after TKA, as component placement errors are associated with inferior function and compromised long-term performance. Furthermore, the publication anticipates an increase in demand for the ATR technique in the future, for demographic reasons and for longevity. For this reason, the improvement of this surgical technique is considered of great importance. The publication highlights that the misalignment of the tibial and femoral components remains a major concern, since currently deviations exceeding 3 ° varus / valgus in the mechanical axis are related to a failure of the ATR. Consequently, the tibial and femoral components must be positioned as accurately as possible. Despite the potential surgical benefits of using patient-specific cutting blocks, it is considered that there are no long-term implant survival data to conclusively support their use. The advantages of these systems remain controversial. The article explains that the accuracy of the anatomical landmarks is crucial for the final precision of the technique. In the case of joint deformities, the accuracy of the preoperative images may be compromised. Finally, some studies consider the precision obtained between the ATRs performed with PSI and those performed with SI to be comparable. The article concludes by stating that, based on the reviewed scientific works, both techniques are capable of restoring limb alignment and positioning prosthetic components with equivalent precision. Therefore, cost-effectiveness or unquestionable benefits for ATR using PSI are not considered proven. Consequently, given the current demand and importance of TKA and the high health budget it entails, any improvement in the technique is considered of great importance and interest.
    [0027] The object of the invention is a system for aligning the instruments used for bone resections in Total Knee Arthroplasty that improves the precision of known alignment systems and that simplifies surgical intervention.
    [0029] Brief description of the invention
    [0031] The object of the invention is an improved system for personalized extramedullary alignment of the instruments (cutting guides) commonly used in total knee arthroplasty. The alignment system of the invention is characterized by comprising a fixed femoral guide intended to be placed on the femur of a patient. The fixed femoral guide, comprising a curved surface partially delimited by an irregular edge, is configured to fit and tightly contact the femur by surrounding the articular surface of the femoral condyles but not overlapping with said articular surface. The fixed femoral guide comprises a fixation element to allow attachment of the fixed femoral guide to the femur. The fixed femoral guide also comprises a connecting element through which two attachable femoral guides can be detachably and consecutively connected. These attachable femoral guides allow the making of femoral perforations compatible with the use of conventional femoral cutting guides, as will be detailed later in this document. The alignment system of the invention also comprises a tibial guide intended to be placed on an anteromedial region of the patient's tibia, surrounding the articular surface of the tibia but without overlapping said articular surface.
    [0033] Thanks to the structural configuration of the Fixed Femoral Guide, it is possible place or support it on a healthy part of the femur, unlike other personalized alignment systems that rest on parts of the articular surfaces that are diseased or affected by osteophytes (pathological bone resulting from joint degeneration and cartilage defects difficult to segment). Consequently, greater precision is obtained with respect to the location of the perforations on which the conventional cutting guides used for bone resections will later be placed. The tibial guide of the system of the invention also rests on healthy bone, as is the case with the fixed femoral guide.
    [0035] The alignment system of the invention is designed to be compatible with known conventional cutting guides, with consequent economic advantages.
    [0037] Furthermore, by not requiring intramedullary intervention, the alignment system of the invention implies a less invasive performance compared to conventional alignment systems of this type.
    [0039] A method for the design of the alignment system is also an object of the present invention. The design method comprises a preliminary step to obtain a bone model of the patient's lower limb, in order to carry out preoperative planning for the personalized design of the guides. Preferably, the bone model is obtained from a CT scan, other diagnostic methods that provide equivalent precision are admissible.
    [0041] The use of the personalized extramedullary alignment system of the invention eliminates the need to perform a series of operations, common during a conventional TKA, such as determining the size of the prosthetic component or the thickness of the tibial prosthetic component, which are calculated preoperatively through starting from the bone model in the method of the invention.
    [0043] In short, by using the alignment system object of the present invention, a better alignment is achieved, the placement of prosthetic components, bleeding is reduced and surgical intervention is simplified.
    [0045] The surgical intervention to carry out the implantation of the total knee prosthesis is not the object of the present invention.
    [0047] Brief description of the figures
    [0049] The details of the invention can be seen in the accompanying figures, these are not intended to be limiting of the scope of the invention:
    [0051] - Figure 1 shows a view of the knee joint in which some of the internal structures of its anatomy are schematically represented.
    [0052] - Figure 2 shows a schematic representation of the femur and tibia, in which their mechanical and anatomical axes are represented. - Figure 3 illustrates some aspects of the conventional femoral alignment technique used in the State of the Art during a total knee arthroplasty.
    [0053] - Figures 4A, 4B, 4C and 4D respectively show a perspective, a top plan view, a rear elevation and a bottom plan view of an embodiment of the fixed femoral guide of the alignment system according to the invention.
    [0054] Figures 5A, 5B, 5C and 5D respectively show two perspectives, a side view and a plan view of an embodiment of the first femoral guide that can be coupled to the fixed femoral guide of Figures 4A-4D.
    [0055] - Figures 6A, 6B, 6C and 6D respectively show two perspectives, a front elevation and a side elevation of an embodiment of the second femoral guide that can be coupled to the fixed femoral guide of Figures 4A-4D.
    [0056] Figures 7A, 7B and 7C respectively show a front perspective, a front view and a rear perspective of an embodiment of the tibial guide of the alignment system of the invention. - Figures 8 to 10 show images of a bone model showing illustrate the placement and adaptation of the Fixed Femoral Guide to the femur. - Figures 11 to 13 show images of a bone model illustrating the coupling between the fixed femoral guide and the first attachable femoral guide.
    [0057] - Figures 14 to 17 illustrate the functionality of the fixed femoral guide to allow the distal cut of the femur to be made.
    [0058] - Figures 18 and 19 show images of a bone model illustrating the coupling between the fixed femoral guide and the second attachable femoral guide, as well as the functionality of this second attachable femoral guide.
    [0059] - Figures 20 to 22 show images of a bone model that illustrate the placement and adaptation of the tibial guide on the tibia.
    [0060] - Figures 23 and 24 illustrate the functionality of the tibial guide to allow the tibial cut to be made.
    [0062] Detailed description of the invention
    [0064] The system of the invention relates to an improved extramedullary alignment system for use in total knee arthroplasty and to a method for designing such a system.
    [0066] The following is a review of some parts of the anatomy of the knee joint, as a preliminary step to understand the particularities and advantages of the invention that will be explained in detail later. Figure 1 shows the anatomy of a knee joint (50), schematically representing some of the internal structures of its anatomy. As can be seen in the figure, the knee joint (50) joins the distal end of the femur (51) with the proximal end of the tibia (52), thus enabling the connection between the thigh and the leg and helping to support the body weight. The patella (53), articulated with the femur (50), allows flexion and extension movements. As in other long bones, in the femur (51) an elongated central part or diaphysis (51a) located between two ends or epiphysis (51c) is distinguished. The joint is located in the epiphysis (51c) and the junction area between the diaphysis (51a) and the epiphysis (51c) is known as the metaphysis (51b). The femur (50) comprises in its distal end two femoral condyles (54) or convex rounded protrusions separated by an intermediate space called the intercondylar space. The anterior, inferior and posterior faces of the femoral condyles (54) are articular and define the femoral trochlea (56), provided with a central depression between the femoral condyles (54) on the anterior face of the femur (51). The femoral condyles (54) are not identical, as the medial condyle (54b) protrudes more and is narrower than the lateral condyle (54a). The epicondyles are also distinguished, which are bony elevations in the non-articular areas of the femoral condyles (54) and are united by the epicondylar line. For its part, the proximal end of the tibia (52) comprises a tibial plateau (58) with two glenoid cavities (59) slightly concave and intended to receive the femoral condyles (54). As in other mobile joints, the movement involves two or more articular surfaces between which the relative movement occurs. The knee joint (50) is a complex joint, formed by two different joints: the main one, the femorotibial joint that connects the surfaces of the two femoral condyles (54) with the tibia (52), and the patellofemoral joint between the femoral trochlea (56) and the posterior part of the patella (53). The joint is surrounded by a fibrous joint capsule (not shown in Figure 1) that constitutes a closed space that houses the patella (53), a portion of the distal end of the femur (51) and a portion of the proximal end of the tibia ( 52). Additionally, the joint action between the bones, femur (50), tibia (51) and patella (53) is complemented by the action of the menisci (60). The menisci (60) are two fibrocartilaginous structures arranged between the femur (51) and the tibia (52) on the tibial plateau (58), presenting a flatter lower face on the tibial plateau (58) and an upper face more concave than adapts to the femoral condyles (54). Its function is to improve the coupling between the articular surfaces, between the femoral condyles (54) and the glenoid cavities (59) of the patella (53), providing an elastic connection and participating in the transmission of compression forces between the femur ( 51) and tibia (52). Thus, the menisci (60) distribute the forces in the knee and the loads that are exerted on the articular surfaces of the knee, reducing friction and contributing to the stabilization of the joint. Between the bones of the joint the articular cartilage (61) is arranged covering the surfaces articular. Like other mobile joints, bones are held together by the joint action of the joint capsule and the complementary work of a series of associated ligaments, intertwined with the capsular tissue. Ligaments enhance the stability of the joint, allowing and facilitating limited movement of the knee joint and restricting other anatomically inappropriate or excessive movements. The structures detailed above cooperate with the tendons, which are also part of the knee and whose function is to connect the bones to the muscles to transmit muscle force to the bone allowing movement.
    [0068] In Figure 2 the mechanical and anatomical axes of the femur and the tibia are schematically represented. The mechanical axis (51m, 52m) links the centers of the hip, knee and ankle joints. The anatomical or diaphyseal axis (51d) of the femur joins the center of the intercondylar notch with the apex of the greater trochanter. As can be seen in the figure, the mechanical (51m) and diaphyseal (51d) axes of the femur are not coincident, the diaphyseal axis (51d) forming an angle of about 170 ° -175 ° with the mechanical axis (52m) of the tibia. .
    [0070] In a healthy knee, the articular cartilage (61) that lines the articular surfaces of the femoral condyles (54), the tibial plateau (58) and the patella (53) is smooth and smooth allowing movement without pain. The deterioration of the articular cartilage (61), as a result of an injury or osteoarthritis or other diseases, can cause pain and functional limitation, causing a significant decrease in the quality of life. In this circumstance, the total replacement of the knee joint, which has suffered significant wear, with a prosthesis may be indicated.
    [0072] Conventional TKA, known in the State of the Art, is a surgical technique performed under anesthesia so that a surgeon can replace the diseased joint with prosthetic components made of artificial materials. For this, the distal end of the femur (51) is resected and the femoral condyles (54) are replaced by a first prosthetic component, usually metallic chromium, cobalt or titanium.
    [0073] This first component has a shape similar to the femoral condyles (54). Additionally, the proximal end of the tibia (52) is resected for the subsequent placement of a second prosthetic component. On this second prosthetic component, shaped like a tray and provided with a normally metallic surface, some pieces of plastic (polyethylene) are placed to replace the menisci. Finally, if replacement of the patella is necessary, a third plastic prosthetic component (polyethylene) will be placed in a slidable manner with respect to the depression located between the two hemispheres of the first prosthetic component that replaces the femur, so that the patient perform knee flexion and extension movements without pain.
    [0075] In order to perform the necessary osteotomies or resections in the knee bones, for the subsequent placement of the aforementioned prosthetic components, alignment systems are currently used that allow placing conventional cutting guides to perform said resections with the greatest possible precision. The conventional protocol comprises a femoral intramedullary alignment, a distal resection of the femur using a first cutting block or guide, femoral size determination, anterior, posterior and oblique femoral bone resections or osteotomies using a second cutting guide or cutting block 4 in 1, intramedullary or optionally extramedullary tibial alignment, tibial resection, determination of tibial size, optional patella resection, and finally, placement of prosthetic components. Figure 3 shows some aspects of the conventional femoral alignment technique for performing a TKA, using intramedullary alignment instruments. For this, a femoral alignment guide is usually used, which comprises a rod about 9 millimeters thick. This rod is inserted into the intramedullary canal of the femur until the guide for femoral alignment (not shown in Figure 3) contacts the edge of the distal femoral condyle. On the femoral alignment guide, pins are placed on which the conventional cutting guide for distal resection of the femur is mounted. The complete conventional technique for performing TKA is explained in various State of the Art documents that detail the complete surgical protocol to be followed.
    [0076] The present invention provides an alternative alignment system that allows the conventional cutting guides commonly used to perform the femoral and tibial resections necessary for the placement of a TKR to be positioned. The alignment system of the invention is designed from preoperative images of the patient's anatomy and is compatible with the use of conventional cutting guides on the market.
    [0078] The invention also relates to a method for the design of the alignment system. According to the method of the invention, a preoperative planning of the lower limb of the patient is performed, obtaining from a digital bone model. From this digital bone model, four patient-specific alignment guides or components are designed: three alignment guides for femur preparation and one alignment guide for tibia preparation. Preferably, the bone model for the preoperative study is obtained from a CT (Computerized Axial Tomography), a suitable technique for allowing a very precise reproduction of the anatomy of the femur and tibia in a suitable time. However, other diagnostic techniques that provide CT-like precision, for example magnetic resonance imaging or others, are considered compatible with the invention.
    [0080] The system according to the invention is characterized by comprising a first alignment guide or fixed femoral guide (1). This fixed femoral guide (1), suitable for surgical use and designed from the bone model of the patient's femur, is intended to be placed on the patient's femur and to remain fixed to the femur until the preparations for performing the femoral cuts are completed. , as explained later. Figures 4A, 4B, 4C and 4D show an embodiment of the fixed femoral guide (1). Figure 4A shows a perspective of the fixed femoral guide (1) and Figures 4B, 4C and 4D show respectively a top plan view, a rear elevation and a bottom plan view allowing a detailed view of the structural particularities of the fixed femoral guide . In the particular embodiment of the figures, the fixed femoral guide (1) comprises a lower curved portion (12) provided with a central part (12c) and two lateral wings or extensions (12a, 12b) that extend from the central part (12c) towards two opposite sides of the fixed femoral guide (1). The central part (12c) comprises a flatter rear part and a front part that can have a certain elevation with respect to the rear part. Additionally, this lower portion (12) has an upper face (13) and a lower face (14) opposite each other and delimited by a contour (15). The fixed femoral guide (1) according to the present invention has the particularity of presenting a surface of essentially concave shape although of variable curvature, this surface being configured to come into contact in an adapted way on the femur, when the femoral guide fixes ( 1) is placed on the femur. More specifically, the fixed femoral guide (1) is placed on the femur, supporting substantially on the anterior metaphyseal region of the femur in an area close to the articular surface of the femoral condyles, surrounding said articular surface but without overlapping with the articular surface. In the particular embodiment of Figures 4A-4D, said curved surface is included in the lower face (14). Additionally, the fixed femoral guide (1) is characterized by presenting an irregular edge (15a) configured to adapt to the area of the femoral condyles that borders the articular cartilage. In the embodiment of the figures, the contour (15) comprises a substantially rectilinear arched posterior section (15b) and an anterior section defined by the irregular edge (15a). The irregular edge (15a) allows the fixed femoral guide to adapt to the femoral trochlea just at the limit of the articular cartilage but without overlapping or resting on said articular cartilage. Thanks to this geometric configuration, the fixed femoral guide (1) is designed to be placed on a healthy area of the femoral bone. The exact configuration of the irregular edge (15a) and the curved surface of the lower face (14) that rests on the femur is variable, being calculated in a personalized way in the preoperative study to perfectly adapt to the anatomical characteristics of the femur of each patient.
    [0082] Figures 8 to 10 show images of a bone model illustrating the placement and adaptation of the fixed femoral guide (1) of the present embodiment to the bony surface of the femur. It is particularly advantageous that the fixed femoral guide (1) rests substantially on the anterior metaphyseal region of the patient's femur without invading the articular cartilage area. In this way, the fixed femoral guide (1) rests on a healthy part of the bone and fits perfectly and unequivocally in a single position on the patient's bone, unlike other custom or custom conventional alignment systems whose components rest on the part joint disease, being common the presence of osteophytes on damaged joint surfaces (62) (see Figure 3). The support of alignment components on these deteriorated articular surfaces (62) with defects in the articular cartilage can introduce inaccuracies to avoid.
    [0084] Figure 8 illustrates the placement of the fixed femoral guide (1) on the femur. As can be seen in the figure, the lateral extensions (12a, 12b) are arranged on the metaphyseal region of the femur (51) in areas adjacent to the lateral condyle (54a) and the medial condyle (54b) respectively. Optionally, as is clearly seen in Figures 4B-4D, a lateral extension (12b) of the fixed femoral guide (1) has a greater extension or dimension than the other lateral extension (12a). The longest lateral extension (12b) is placed over the metaphyseal region of the femur in an area adjacent to the most prominent medial condyle (54b), optimizing the adaptation of the fixed femoral guide (1) to the femur.
    [0086] The fixed femoral guide (1) of the present embodiment further comprises an upper portion (11). This upper portion (11) is located on the central part (12c) and is attached to the lower portion (12) customized for each patient. Both upper (11) and lower (12) portions form a single piece in the particular embodiment of the figures.
    [0088] The fixed femoral guide (1) is also characterized by comprising a fixation element to allow the attachment of the fixed femoral guide (1) to the femur. Optionally, as in the embodiment of Figures 4A-4B, the upper portion (11) of the fixed femoral guide (1) comprises a rectangular protrusion (11a) projecting above the lower portion (12) and the fixation element consists of three through holes (16a, 16b) located on opposite sides of the rectangular bulge (11a). These through holes (16a, 16b) pass through the rectangular protrusion (11a) and the lower portion (12), thus being configured to house or receive pins (19) for fixing the fixed femoral guide (1) to the femur (51 ), as represented in the bone model in Figure 10. Optionally, the holes (16a, 16b) have directions or relative angulations that are variable or different from each other, a configuration that prevents the unwanted disconnection of the pins (19) and contributes to reinforcing the adaptation of the fixed femoral guide (1) to the femur. Otherwise, the exact number and arrangement of the through holes (16a, 16b) may vary.
    [0090] The fixed femoral guide (1) additionally comprises a connecting element that allows to detachably and consecutively couple two additional attachable femoral guides (2, 3). Optionally, as in the embodiment of the figures, the connection element of the fixed femoral guide (1) comprises a through hole (17) as a rail. This through hole (17) extends substantially in the direction of a longitudinal axis (17a) passing through the rectangular protrusion (11a) of the upper portion (11). As will be explained later when the configuration of the attachable femoral guides (2, 3) is detailed, it is particularly advantageous that the direction of the longitudinal axis (17a) of the through hole (17) is parallel to the mechanical axis of the femur (in view anterior of the femur) and parallel to the diaphyseal axis of the femur (in lateral view of the femur) when the fixed femoral guide (1) is placed on the femur.
    [0092] Once attached to the femur, the fixed femoral guide (1) is held in position until the preparations for making the femoral cuts are completed, as will be detailed below and as illustrated in Figures 11 to 19.
    [0094] The alignment system of the invention comprises a first femoral guide that can be attached to the fixed femoral guide (1). Figures 5A, 5B, 5C and 5D illustrate a particular embodiment of this first attachable femoral guide (2) and Figures 11 to 13 show representations of a bone model that allows visualizing the coupling between the fixed femoral guide (1) of the figures 4A-4D and the first attachable femoral guide (2) of Figures 5A-5D. In this particular example, to make this connection or coupling between both guides (1, 2), the first attachable femoral guide (2) comprises a posterior portion (21) provided with a connection element complementary to the connection element of the femoral guide fixed (1). For this, the complementary connection element has a geometric configuration adapted to the shape and dimension of the connection element of the fixed femoral guide (1). Optionally, as in the embodiment of the figures, the complementary connection element is an elongated rail (27) configured to movably or slidably engage with respect to the through bore (17) of the fixed femoral guide (1). For this, the rail (27) also extends substantially along a longitudinal axis (27a) and its shape and dimension are adjusted to the shape and dimension of the through hole (17) of the fixed femoral guide (1). In this way both guides (1, 2) are easily coupled by means of a relative sliding movement between both connection components (17, 27) in the direction of the axes (17a, 27a), leaving these axes (17a, 27a) overlapping as seen in Figure 13. Thus, when the fixed femoral guide (1) and the first attachable femoral guide (2) are connected, the rail (27) longitudinally traverses the through hole (17) allowing separable coupling between the guides (1, 2) in a simple way.
    [0096] As also seen in Figures 5A, 5B and 5D, the first attachable femoral guide (2) of the illustrated embodiment further comprises an intermediate portion (22), widened with respect to the posterior portion (21), and an anterior portion ( 23) extending from the intermediate portion (22) in a direction that forms a certain angle with the axis (27a) of the rail (27). Optionally, as in the described embodiment, the front portion (23) comprises two substantially vertical inclined arms (23d) and one substantially horizontal arm (23e), these arms (23d, 23e) presenting a triangular arrangement. As can be clearly seen in Figures 5B and 11, the arms (23d, 23e) delimit a central hollow (23c), the first attachable femoral guide (2) also presenting a projection (23a) in one of the lower vertices of the triangular arrangement formed by the arms (23d, 23e). Thanks to these structural elements, It is possible to simply limit the displacement of the first attachable femoral guide (2) with respect to the fixed femoral guide (1). For this, as seen in Figures 11-13, once the fixed femoral guide (1) is properly positioned on the femur (51), the through hole (17) of the first attachable femoral guide (2) can slide inside the rail (27) of the fixed femoral guide (1) until the anterior portion (23) of the first attachable femoral guide (2) contacts both femoral condyles (54). The projection (23a) facilitates the support of the first attachable femoral guide (2) on both condyles (54a, 54b), as can be seen especially in Figure 13, improving the stability of the coupling between both guides (1,2).
    [0098] The function of the central hole (23c) is to provide a window for better visualization during the surgical intervention, additionally allowing the introduction of instruments, for example to carry out checks that may be necessary during surgery.
    [0100] The intermediate portion (22) of the first attachable femoral guide (2) has the additional feature of being provided with an alignment element. In the embodiment of the figures, the alignment element comprises a pair of substantially parallel through-holes (28) traversing the intermediate portion (22). The function of these holes (28) is to allow perforations to be made in the anterior cortex of the femur, once the fixed femoral guide (1) is placed on the femur and the guides (1, 2) are engaged. The perforations made allow the insertion of metal pins (29) into the femur through these holes (28), these metal pins (29) being the type usually used for the placement of a distal cutting guide of a PTR conventional. In the alignment system of the invention, the configuration of the holes (28) is calculated and planned in a personalized way from the preoperative study. Thus, the position of the holes (28) is precisely determined so that the conventional distal cutting guide is mounted on the pins (29) presenting an orientation that makes it possible to perform a distal cut perpendicular to the mechanical axis of the femur. To do this, once the metal pins (29) have been placed through the holes (28), the Attachable Femoral Guide (2) leaving the pins (29) positioned as shown in Figures 14 and 15. The attachable femoral guide (2) can be removed by cutting the rail (27) with a chisel. Subsequently, a conventional distal cutting guide can be placed on the pins (29) to make a distal cut perpendicular to the mechanical axis of the femur (cut illustrated in Figures 16 and 17).
    [0102] Preferably, the direction of the axis (27a) of the rail (27) is parallel to the mechanical axis of the femur (in anterior view) and parallel to the diaphyseal axis of the femur (in lateral view), the angle between the rail (27) and the part anterior (23) is substantially straight (as in the embodiment of the figures) and the plane defined by the holes (28) is perpendicular to the mechanical axis of the femur, when the fixed femoral guide (1) is placed on the femur and the first Attachable Guide (2) is attached to the Fixed Femoral Guide (1). In this way, the plane defined by the holes (28) is parallel to the distal cut, made using the conventional distal cut guide placed on the pins (29).
    [0104] Thanks to the coupling between the guides (1, 2) and the personalized and precise coupling of the fixed femoral guide (1) on the healthy bone surface of the patient, the alignment system according to the invention allows to translate preoperative calculations with great precision to the surgical intervention performed on the patient.
    [0106] The alignment system of the invention comprises a second femoral guide attachable (3) to the fixed femoral guide (1). Figures 6A, 6B, 6C and 6D illustrate a particular embodiment of this second attachable femoral guide (3). Figures 18 and 19 illustrate the coupling between the second attachable femoral guide (3) of Figures 6A-6D and the fixed femoral guide (1) of Figures 4A-4D. In this particular example, to make the coupling between both guides (1, 3), the second attachable femoral guide (3) comprises a posterior portion (31) provided with a complementary connection element with respect to the connection element of the femoral guide fixed (1). This complementary connection element has a geometric configuration adapted to the shape and dimension of the connection element of the fixed femoral guide (1). Optionally, the connecting element Complementary is an elongated rail (37), similar to that of the first attachable femoral guide (2), configured to engage displaceably or slidably with respect to the through hole (17) of the fixed femoral guide (1). For this, the rail (37) extends along a longitudinal axis (37 a) and its shape and dimension are adjusted to the shape and dimension of the through hole (17) of the fixed femoral guide (1). In this way, the fixed femoral guide (1) and the second attachable femoral guide (3) are easily coupled, by means of a relative displacement in the direction of the axes (17a, 37 a) that are superimposed as shown in the Figure 18. Thus, when the fixed femoral guide (1) and the second attachable femoral guide (3) are coupled, the rail (37) runs longitudinally through the through hole (17) of the fixed femoral guide (1). The displacement is limited by the contact of the second attachable femoral guide (3) with the previously cut distal surface of the femur.
    [0108] The second attachable femoral guide (3) also optionally comprises an intermediate portion (32), widened with respect to the posterior portion (31), slightly curved and connected with an anterior portion (33). The anterior portion (33) extends from the intermediate portion (32) in a direction that forms an angle with the posterior portion (31). Optionally, as in the embodiment of the figures, the front portion (33) comprises a substantially vertical arm (33d) and an arm (33e) inclined with respect to the arm (33d), these arms (33d, 33e) having approximately an inverted T-shaped configuration.
    [0110] The attachable femoral guide (3) has the particularity of comprising an alignment element. The function of this alignment element is to allow perforations in the femur, once the distal cut has been made, suitable for the subsequent placement of a 4-in-1 cutting guide of a conventional PTR. Preferably, the alignment element comprises a plurality of pairs of indicators or parallel through holes (38), each pair being arranged in alignment on the inclined arm (33e) of the anterior portion (33). As seen in Figure 6C, in this particular embodiment, the attachable femoral guide (3) incorporates two pairs of holes (38). In the alignment system of the invention, the configuration of the holes (38) is calculated and planned in a personalized way from the study preoperative. The pairs of holes (38) have the particularity of being aligned parallel to the epicondylar line, when the fixed femoral guide (1) is placed on the femur and the second attachable femoral guide (3) is coupled to the fixed femoral guide (1). This alignment feature provides the proper rotation for the femoral prosthetic component.
    [0112] In the embodiment of the figures, the position of the through holes (38) is calculated by means of a preoperative CT scan. Its geometry allows the realization of perforations, for the subsequent placement of a conventional 4-in-1 guide to perform the anterior, anterior oblique, posterior and posterior oblique femoral cuts. The size of the femoral prosthetic component to be used is also calculated preoperatively, which will define the appropriate conventional cutting guide for said size. The attachable femoral guide (3) is removed after drilling as well as the fixed femoral guide (1).
    [0114] Preferably, the direction of the axis (33a) of the rail (37) is parallel to the mechanical axis of the femur (in anterior view) and parallel to the diaphyseal axis of the femur (in lateral view) and the angle between the rail (37) and the part anterior (33) is substantially straight (as in the embodiment of the figures) when the fixed femoral guide (1) is placed on the femur and the first attachable guide (3) is coupled to the fixed femoral guide (1) resting on the femur after the distal cut has been made.
    [0116] Thanks to the detachable coupling between the guides (1, 3) and the personalized and precise coupling of the fixed femoral guide (1) on the healthy bone surface of the patient, the alignment system according to the invention allows to translate the Preoperative calculations to the surgical intervention performed on the patient. Once the femoral cuts are completed, the femur is ready for the placement of the femoral prosthesis.
    [0118] According to what has been explained, the fixed femoral guide (1) and the attachable femoral guides (2, 3) are not cutting guides but auxiliary alignment elements for the precise drilling of the femur, compatible with the subsequent placement of conventional cutting guides commonly used to perform the distal cut and other femoral cuts in a TKA.
    [0120] The alignment system of the invention is completed with a fourth tibial guide (4). Similar to the fixed femoral guide (1), the tibial guide (4) is calculated from a bone model of the patient's tibia, obtained by means of a CT scan or other diagnostic method that provides equivalent performance. Figures 7A, 7B and 7C show an embodiment of the tibial guide (4). The images of the bone model in Figures 20 to 24 illustrate the placement and functionality of the tibial guide (4). This fourth tibial guide (4) is specifically designed to be positioned and adapted over an anteromedial region of the tibia, reaching an area adjacent to the articular surface but without overlapping with said articular surface. In this way, the tibial guide (4) rests precisely and unequivocally on the healthy surface of the patient's bone, outside the diseased articular surface, obtaining greater surgical precision with respect to other conventional techniques.
    [0122] Optionally, as in the embodiment of the figures, the tibial guide (4) has an anterior face (43) and a posterior face (44) opposite each other and delimited by a contour (45). The tibial guide (4) of the invention has the particularity of presenting a surface of variable curvature, included in the posterior face (44) and designed to adapt to the healthy part of the tibia without invading the articular cartilage. For this, an upper section of the contour (45) is placed bordering the articular cartilage of the tibia, as can be seen in Figures 20 to 22. The tibial guide (4) is further characterized by comprising an alignment element, also configured as custom shape. In the embodiment described, the alignment element comprises a pair of indicators or through holes (48) that pass through protrusions (40) of the tibial guide (4). The function of these holes (48) is to allow perforations to be made in the tibia for the placement of metal pins (49) as shown in Figure 23. These pins (49) are compatible with the tibial cutting guide of a conventional PTR. Preferably, the plane defined by the protrusions (40) of the tibial guide (4) and the direction of the through holes (48) are perpendicular to the mechanical axis of the tibia (in frontal view), to allow a tibial cut parallel to the direction of the pins (49) and perpendicular to the tibial mechanical axis. Once the pins (49) are placed, the tibial alignment guide (4) of the invention is removed as illustrated in Figure 24. On these pins (49) the conventional tibial cutting guide (not shown) can be subsequently placed for the realization tibial cut.
    [0124] Additionally, the contour (45) comprises a lateral edge (40), calculated by means of the preoperative CT, to allow the realization of a mark during the surgery that will indicate the limit of the rotation of the tibial prosthetic component.
    [0126] The guides (1, 2, 3 4) of the described embodiment are manufactured by additive manufacturing (3D printing) of a thermoplastic material, a method that allows the sustainable production of components at an adjusted cost. However, other manufacturing alternatives compatible with the essence of the invention are contemplated.
    权利要求:
    Claims (23)
    [1]
    1. Extramedullary alignment system of the instruments used in total knee arthroplasty, which is characterized by comprising:
    - a fixed femoral guide (1), intended to be placed on the femur of a patient, comprising a curved surface partially delimited by an irregular edge (15a) and configured to fit and come into tight contact with the femur surrounding the articular surface of the femoral condyles but without overlapping with said articular surface, a fixation element to allow the attachment of the fixed femoral guide (1) to the femur and a connection element through which two guides can be detachably and consecutively connected attachable femoral (2, 3); and
    - a tibial guide (4), intended to be placed on an anteromedial region of the patient's tibia, comprising a curved surface configured to adapt to the tibia surrounding the articular surface of the tibia but without overlapping with said articular surface.
    [2]
    2. Alignment system, according to claim 1, wherein the curved surface and the irregular edge (15a) of the fixed femoral guide (1) are designed from a bone model obtained through a CT scan.
    [3]
    3. Alignment system according to claim 1, wherein the fixation element of the fixed femoral guide (1) comprises a plurality of through holes (16a, 16b) with different relative angulation.
    [4]
    Alignment system according to claim 1, wherein the fixed femoral guide (1) comprises a curved lower portion (12) provided with a central part (12c) and two lateral extensions (12a, 12b) that extend from the part center (12c) towards two opposite sides of the fixed femoral guide (1), where the lower portion (12) has an upper face (13) and a lower face (14) separated by a contour (15), the curved surface being adaptable to the femur included in this lower face (14) and the irregular edge (15a) being included in a front section of the contour (15).
    [5]
    5. Alignment system according to claim 4, wherein a lateral extension (12b) of the fixed femoral guide (1) has a greater extension than the other lateral extension (12a) for a better adaptation of the fixed femoral guide (1) to the femur.
    [6]
    6. Alignment system, according to claim 4, wherein the fixed femoral guide (1) comprises an upper portion (11) located on the central part (12c) and provided with a protrusion (11a), where the fixation element of the Fixed femoral guide (1) comprises three through holes (16a, 16b) located on opposite sides of the rectangular protrusion (11a) through the rectangular protrusion (11a) and the lower part (12), and where two of the holes (16a) they present a different angulation than the third hole (16b).
    [7]
    7. Alignment system, according to claim 6, wherein the upper portion (11) and the lower portion (12) form a single piece.
    [8]
    8. Alignment system according to claim 1, wherein the connection element of the fixed femoral guide (1) comprises a through hole (17) that extends substantially in the direction of a longitudinal axis (17a) passing through a rectangular protrusion ( 11a) protruding above the curved surface.
    [9]
    9. Alignment system according to claim 8, wherein the longitudinal axis (17a) of the through hole (17) has an arrangement parallel to the mechanical axis of the femur when the fixed femoral guide (1) is placed on the femur.
    [10]
    10. Alignment system, according to claim 1, wherein the first attachable femoral guide (2) comprises two through holes (28), the holes (28) being arranged in a plane perpendicular to the mechanical axis of the femur when the guide (1) It is placed on the femur and the first attachable femoral guide (2) is attached to the fixed femoral guide (1).
    [11]
    11. Alignment system, according to claim 10, wherein the configuration of the through holes (28) is calculated from a bone model obtained by means of a CT scan.
    [12]
    12. Alignment system, according to claim 10, wherein the first attachable femoral guide (2) comprises a posterior portion (21), provided with a complementary connection element that has a geometric configuration adapted to the shape and dimension of the connection element. of the fixed femoral guide (1), an intermediate portion (22) widened with respect to the posterior portion (21) that houses the through holes (28) and an anterior portion (23) that extends from the intermediate portion (22) in a direction that forms a substantially right angle with the rear portion (21).
    [13]
    13. Alignment system, according to claim 12, wherein the complementary connection element is an elongated rail (27) that extends in the direction of a longitudinal axis (27a), presenting a shape and dimension adjusted to the shape and dimension of a through hole (17) of the fixed femoral guide (1) and being movable with respect to said through hole (17), so that the fixed femoral guide (1) and the first attachable femoral guide (2) are coupled by means of a relative sliding movement in the direction of the axis (27a).
    [14]
    14. Alignment system, according to claim 12, wherein the anterior portion (23) has a triangular arrangement, comprising a projection (23a) at one of the vertices of the triangular arrangement to facilitate the support of the anterior portion (23) on both femoral condyles (54) when the fixed femoral guide (1) is positioned on the femur and the first attachable femoral guide (2) is coupled to the fixed femoral guide (1).
    [15]
    15. Alignment system, according to claim 14, wherein the front portion (23) comprises two substantially vertical inclined arms (23d) and a third substantially horizontal arm (23e) that make up the triangular arrangement delimiting a central gap (23c).
    [16]
    16. Alignment system, according to claim 1, where the second attachable femoral guide (3) comprises at least one pair of through holes (38), these holes (38) being aligned parallel to the epicondylar line of the femur when the Fixed Femoral Guide (1) is positioned over the femur and the second attachable Femoral Guide (3) is attached to the Fixed Femoral Guide (1).
    [17]
    17. Alignment system, according to claim 16, where the position of the holes (38) is calculated from a bone model obtained by CT
    [18]
    18. Alignment system according to claim 16, wherein the second attachable femoral guide (3) comprises a posterior portion (31), provided with a complementary connection element that has a geometric configuration adapted to the shape and dimension of the connection element. of the fixed femoral guide (1) and an anterior portion (33) that forms a substantially right angle with the posterior portion (31) and that houses the holes (38).
    [19]
    19. Alignment system, according to claim 18, wherein the complementary connection element is an elongated rail (37) that extends in the direction of a longitudinal axis (37a), presenting a shape and dimension adjusted to the shape and dimension of a through hole (17) of the fixed femoral guide (1) and being movable with respect to said through hole (17), so that the fixed femoral guide (1) and the second attachable femoral guide (3) are coupled by means of a relative sliding movement in the direction of the axis (37a).
    [20]
    20. Alignment system according to claim 18, wherein the portion Front (33) comprises a vertical arm (33d) and a second inclined arm (33e) traversed by the pair of holes (38).
    [21]
    21. Alignment system, according to claim 1, wherein the tibial guide (4) is designed from a bone model obtained through a CT scan.
    [22]
    22. Alignment system according to claim 1, wherein the tibial guide (4) comprises two through holes (48) arranged in a plane perpendicular to the tibial mechanical axis when the tibial guide (4) is positioned on the tibia.
    [23]
    23. Design method for an extramedullary alignment system for instruments used in total knee arthroplasty, the method comprising the following steps:
    - Obtaining a bone model of a patient, using a CT scan or other diagnostic method that provides equivalent precision;
    - design of a fixed femoral guide (1) from the bone model, provided with a curved surface partially delimited by an irregular edge (15a) and configured to fit and come into close contact with the femur, surrounding the femoral articular surface but without overlapping with said articular surface;
    - Design based on the bone model of a first coupleable femoral guide (2) to the fixed femoral guide (1), the first coupleable femoral guide (2) comprising two through holes (28) calculated to be arranged in a plane perpendicular to the axis femoral mechanical guide when the fixed femoral guide (1) is positioned on the femur and the first attachable femoral guide (2) is attached to the fixed femoral guide (1),
    - Design from the bone model of a second coupleable femoral guide (3) to the fixed femoral guide (1), the second coupleable femoral guide (3) comprising at least one pair of holes (38) Through-holes calculated to be aligned parallel to the epicondylar line of the femur when the fixed femoral guide (1) is positioned on the femur and the second attachable femoral guide (3) is attached to the fixed femoral guide (1),
    - Design of a tibial guide (4) from the bone model, configured to adapt and come into contact with the tibia in a tight way, surrounding the articular surface of the tibia but without overlapping with said articular surface.
    类似技术:
    公开号 | 公开日 | 专利标题
    US10939923B2|2021-03-09|Instruments and methods in performing kinematically-aligned total knee arthroplasty
    US9532788B2|2017-01-03|Systems and methods for determining the mechanical axis of a femur
    US8454616B2|2013-06-04|Method and apparatus for achieving correct limb alignment in unicondylar knee arthroplasty
    US9017334B2|2015-04-28|Patient specific surgical guide locator and mount
    US20060015113A1|2006-01-19|Optimizing patellar femoral mechanics through alternative depth referencing
    US20130035694A1|2013-02-07|Combination ligament tensioner and alignment device
    JP6557008B2|2019-08-07|Femoral sizing jig, femoral resection system, and method
    US10842570B2|2020-11-24|System and method for pre-operatively determining desired alignment of a knee joint
    US9370375B2|2016-06-21|Artificial knee joint and surgical instrument used in artificial knee joint replacement surgery
    ES2798181B2|2021-06-11|INSTRUMENTAL ALIGNMENT SYSTEM USED IN TOTAL KNEE ARTHROPLASTY
    TWI744626B|2021-11-01|The design method and device of patient specific instruments for knee replacement related surgery
    US20210100568A1|2021-04-08|Cutting and drilling template for unicondylar knee arthroplasty
    WO2021008892A1|2021-01-21|Method for designing a joint prosthesis
    同族专利:
    公开号 | 公开日
    ES2798181B2|2021-06-11|
    WO2020245483A1|2020-12-10|
    引用文献:
    公开号 | 申请日 | 公开日 | 申请人 | 专利标题
    US6554837B1|1998-06-29|2003-04-29|Plus Endoprothetik Ag|Device and method for inserting a prosthetic knee|
    US20170056030A1|2006-02-27|2017-03-02|Biomet Manufacturing, Llc|Patient-specific orthopedic instruments|
    US20080275451A1|2007-05-04|2008-11-06|Mcallister Craig M|Distal femoral cutting guide|
    US20140343403A1|2007-05-14|2014-11-20|Queen's University At Kingston|Patient-Specific Surgical Guidance Tool and Method of Use|
    EP3009110A1|2013-06-11|2016-04-20|Hafez, Mahmoud Alm El Din|Device and method for fitting an artificial knee joint using universal electronic templates which can be adapted to all artificial joints|
    AU2012273668A1|2011-06-24|2014-01-09|Stryker Global Technology Center|Anatomically matched patient alignment blocks|
    DE102014107481A1|2014-05-27|2015-12-03|Aesculap Ag|Medical system|
    EP3095398A1|2015-05-22|2016-11-23|Medivation AG|Patient-specific instrument for the referencing of body parts|
    法律状态:
    2020-12-09| BA2A| Patent application published|Ref document number: 2798181 Country of ref document: ES Kind code of ref document: A1 Effective date: 20201209 |
    2021-06-11| FG2A| Definitive protection|Ref document number: 2798181 Country of ref document: ES Kind code of ref document: B2 Effective date: 20210611 |
    优先权:
    申请号 | 申请日 | 专利标题
    ES201930512A|ES2798181B2|2019-06-06|2019-06-06|INSTRUMENTAL ALIGNMENT SYSTEM USED IN TOTAL KNEE ARTHROPLASTY|ES201930512A| ES2798181B2|2019-06-06|2019-06-06|INSTRUMENTAL ALIGNMENT SYSTEM USED IN TOTAL KNEE ARTHROPLASTY|
    PCT/ES2020/070365| WO2020245483A1|2019-06-06|2020-06-02|Instrument alignment system for use in total knee arthroplasty|
    [返回顶部]